Last edited by JoJoll
Monday, August 10, 2020 | History

5 edition of Performance-based government: Examining the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 found in the catalog.

Performance-based government: Examining the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993

joint hearing before the Committee on Government Reform and ... Congress, second session, March 6, 1996

by United States

  • 321 Want to read
  • 4 Currently reading

Published by For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office .
Written in English


The Physical Object
Number of Pages74
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL7374701M
ISBN 100160527570
ISBN 109780160527579
OCLC/WorldCa35122928

  We are proud to announce a new peer-reviewed paper entitled Examining the myth of accountability, high-stakes testing and the achievement gap In this article, we outline how notions of accountability and the achievement gap have relied upon the massive expansion of high-stakes exams in our nation’s schools. Texas-style test and punish accountability manifested in various ways within. full text of "examining contractor performance and government management of retroactive pay for retired veterans with disabilities" see other formats.

  The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of and the George W. Bush administration’s Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) established new routines that were intended to foster performance management by: Poor Performance results in investigation, counseling, meeting and discussion with the employee, training and so on, before dismissal is even contemplated. The procedures for handling poor performance are completely different from the procedures for handling misconduct. Performance is all about how the employee does the job – i.e. quality.

The Legislature deleted the goal of “caring and responsible citizens” and made implementation of the Performance Based Education Act of optional until the year , leaving it to local school boards to decide which schools would participate prior to that time. be based on these results. These tests examining the academic learning. The Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) Manuals are a comprehensive technical resource designed to explain each monitoring year's PBMAS reports. These reports are used by the Texas Education Agency as one part of its overall evaluation of .


Share this book
You might also like
Internet Using Netscape 4.0

Internet Using Netscape 4.0

It is no desert

It is no desert

The two assassins

The two assassins

Medical records directors handbook

Medical records directors handbook

Symmetry and its breaking in quantum field theory

Symmetry and its breaking in quantum field theory

M.C.C. guide to better cricket.

M.C.C. guide to better cricket.

Historians and Archivists

Historians and Archivists

Norby & Yobos Great Adventure

Norby & Yobos Great Adventure

Album of the fellows of the American gynecological society

Album of the fellows of the American gynecological society

The National Eldercare Institute on Multipurpose Senior Centers and Community Focal Points

The National Eldercare Institute on Multipurpose Senior Centers and Community Focal Points

Grace for the journey

Grace for the journey

Mankind in the making

Mankind in the making

barbarian West, 400-1000.

barbarian West, 400-1000.

hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

Performance-based government: Examining the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 by United States Download PDF EPUB FB2

Get this from a library. Performance-based government: examining the Government Performance and Results Act of joint hearing before the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, and the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, second session, March 6, The Government Performance and Results Act of (GPRA) is the latest in a series of attempts to introduce performance budgeting at the federal level in the United States; attempts that largely.

The National Performance Review was created by President Bill Clinton on March 3, He appointed Vice President Al Gore as its leader.

The President gave the review a 6-month deadline -- report results to him by September 7, The review was largely staffed by about career civil servants. To do this, the authors examine the influence of the Government Performance and Results Act of (with consideration of the later Program Assessment Rating Tool of ) on federal performance.

Over the past four years, the U.S. federal government's reform efforts have been led by Vice President Al Gore under the auspices of an interagency task force, the National Performance Review.

It issued a set of recommendations inagain inand reassessed its approaches and progress in early to prepare for the next four years. The purpose of S. 20, the Government Performance and Results Act ofis to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Federal programs by establishing a system to set goals for program performance and to measure results.

Summary. On Mathe Committee on Governmental Affairs voted to report S. 20 as amended. COVID campus closures: see options for getting or retaining Remote Access to subscribed contentCited by: 4. Control Of Corporations, Persons, And Firms Engaged In Interstates Commerce: Hearings 62d Cong., Pursuant ToParts [United States.

Congress. Senate. Committ] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Control Of Corporations, Persons, And Firms Engaged In Interstates Commerce: Hearings 62d Cong., Pursuant To The purpose of this act is to provide for the establishment of strategic planning and performance measurement in the United States Federal Government.

Consequently, this act is forcing many government organizations to plan for accountability in the beginning and show the results generated from expenditures on programs and initiatives.

InCongress passed the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). The purpose of this legislation was to "promote greater efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability in federal spending by establishing a new framework for performance management and budgeting in federal agencies (McMurty 1)." The government is using this program in.

Program Evaluation, Performance Budgeting and PART: The U.S. Federal Government Experience 11 operations” of federal entities so named. This Act was passed expressly “(A) to promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of, and (B) to prevent and detect fraud and abuse in, such programs and operations.”Cited by: 2.

EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GIFTED BEHAVIOR RATING SCORES AND STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Lori M. Cleveland Concordia University – Portland College of Education Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the College of Education in Author: Lori M.

Cleveland. resident George H.W. Bush () met with the National Governors Association and agreed with their assertion that there should be national goals for education which greatly increased the federal government's role in education.

President Bill Clinton () established the Improving America's Schools Act and the Goals The Importance of Public Expenditure Management in Modern Budget Systems izing sources productively, effectively and sensitively (Allen, Tommasi,p).

A clear distinction occurs between expenditure management and expenditure policy. While expenditure policy is trying to find an answer for the question "what" is to be done, ex-File Size: KB. Sunnyvale was the inspiration for the Government Performance and Results Act and was cited by Osborne and Gaebler in their book Reinventing Government.

A Council-Manager city of aboutpeople located south of San Francisco, Sunnyvale is unique in its application of performance measurement and budgeting at the local government level. In addition, the Government Performance and Results Act and the Clinton administration's reinvention effort have forced agencies to focus on performance and strategic planning as never before Author: Susannah Zak Figura.

Government is politics because Public Administrators are charged with the function of promoting and protecting public interest. Government must act in a fair, uniform, and transparent manner. Government is the people. Government actions affect everyone and can't focus on.

The political status of the local government or a local governor's career in the Central Government is determined by the ranking of local economic performance (Maskin et al.,Qian and Xu, ).

2 Hence, senior government officials who act on behalf of state owners and the major SOE shareholders have strong incentives to monitor managers Cited by: The Federal Trade Commission hosted a workshop on Octo to explore online lead generation in various industries including lending and education.

The workshop brought together a variety of stakeholders, including industry representatives, consumer advocates, and government regulators. The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes. Journal of Public Administration Research and The no.

Rossi, Peter H., and Howard E. Freeman. The committee proposes a community health improvement process (CHIP) 1 as a basis for accountable community collaboration in monitoring overall health matters and in addressing specific health issues. This process can support the development of shared community goals for health improvement and the implementation of a planned and integrated approach for achieving those goals.The study, “Citizen Satisfaction and the Kaleidoscope of Government Performance: How Multiple Stakeholders See Government Performance,” reviews surveys and archival data on secondary education and suggests that parents, students, and teachers provide similar assessments of school performance, which reflect the actual quality of the schools.

Performance initiatives accelerated when Congress passed the Government Performance and Results Act of (GPRA). This act mandated that each federal agency develop a strategic plan with outcome-related goals and objectives, develop annual performance plans with output- and outcome-related goals, and report annually to Congress on its progress toward achieving its goals and objectives.